LeapPad Educational Toy as Myth-Sustaining

Children’s toy commercials are semiotic and rhetorical goldmines–not just for kids, but also for parents. As I was recently surfing through different educational toy commercials on the internet, this one caught my attention.

This commercial was obviously made for a very specific audience (parents) at a very specific time (holiday shopping season). The appeal is clear: the LeapPad is a safe and educational alternative to the tablets they themselves likely use on a frequent basis. But there might be a deeper message embedded in this commercial’s delivery.

First, consider the stylistic similarities between LeapPad’s Christmas commercial and this one:

LeapPad’s similarity to the Apple iPad extends beyond its design and practical purposes. The distinct style and format of the iPad commercial, stemming from earlier iPhone commercials, is inconspicuously mimicked by LeapFrog: the tablet’s placement at the center of the shot, the hands of the unidentified user(s) set stably on the sides throughout their demonstration, etc. Here, LeapFrog not only assumes that the viewers (parents) are aware of iPad/iPhone commercials, but also that they have accepted the technological myth that tablet technologies will be a crucial tool–and thus literacy–of their children’s futures. It says, This is what your child needs to be successful and consequently, A child without this tablet is at a disadvantage.

We shouldn’t see any parent that buys their child the LeapPad as a ‘sucker’ for buying into this technological myth–at least not any more than the LeapFrog company itself. By appealing to this contemporary technological myth, largely perpetuated today by Apple and its rivals, LeapFrog has forfeited the infinite array of other design and marketing possibilities for one that subscribes to the tablet code.

The myth, simply put, is the consumer demand for tablets, and the code is the design and function of a tablet: touch-screen, graphic icons, application use, etc.

If this myth pushed by Apple, LeapPad, and almost every other tech company isn’t an attempt to convince consumers and future consumers of a sort of technological determinism, it is at the very least an assertion (or concession) to the technological dominance of tablet technologies and interfaces.



  1. Phil: excellent point about the commericals. Not only is it perpetuating the myth that this is the future, but it is also, as you say, reinforcing the myth that kids without are disadvantaged. But no mention, on purpose, for their end, is made of kids who simply ::cannot:: learn like this. Or that something else may come along.

  2. Very interesting to have the two commercials juxtaposed after another. The LeapPad is appealing to parents for children while the iPad is appealing to users for everyone. Comparatively the LeapPad is demonstrating using these ‘toys’ as learning technologies while the iPad uses it for all aspects life. On one hand I agree that there is a technological shift, but on another I appreciate the balance that needs to occur and the social well-being of our children and each other. Becoming a technology reliant culture is taking away our social culture.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s